First National Bank v. Littlefield
226 U.S. 110 (1912)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
First National Bank v. Littlefield, 226 U.S. 110 (1912)
First National Bank of Princeton, Illinois v. Littlefield
No. 572
Submitted November 4, 1912
Decided December 2, 1912
226 U.S. 110
Syllabus
The settled rule is that the concurrent action of two courts below upon questions of fact will not be disturbed except in case manifest error.
In this case, appellant being claimant below had the burden of proof, and this Court will not reverse the finding of both courts that the burden was not sustained.
193 F. 24 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
