Waskey v. Chambers,
224 U.S. 564 (1912)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Waskey v. Chambers, 224 U.S. 564 (1912)

Waskey v. Chambers

No. 221

Argued April 23, 24, 1912

Decided May 13, 1912

224 U.S. 564


The word "conveyance," as used in § 98 of the Act of June 6, 1900, c. 786, 31 Stat. 321, 505, is not to be narrowly construed, but includes leases, as well as transfers in fee.

One, who, under a lease of a mine, enters on the property and expends money in developing it, gives a valuable consideration for the lease and is protected by the recording act.

A deed altered after acknowledgment and having only one witness is not entitled to registration under the recording act of June 6, 1900, and has no effect against persons without actual notice.

172 F. 73, reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.