United States v. B. & O. S.W. R. Co.,
222 U.S. 8 (1911)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. B. & O. S.W. R. Co., 222 U.S. 8 (1911)

United States v. Baltimore and Ohio

Southwestern Railroad Company

No. 464

Argued October 19, 1911

Decided October 30, 1911

222 U.S. 8


Courts are not inclined to make constructive crimes, and in this case, the general rule that penal statutes must be strictly construed applies.

If there be ambiguity, the character of the statute determines for strict or liberal construction, but where there is no ambiguity, the words of the statute are the measure of its meaning.

A penal statute should not be construed as confounding unwillful with willful acts by uniting in criminality and penalties parties to whom no notice need be given with those to whom notice must be given.

The provisions of § 2 of the Act of March 3, 1905, 33 Stat. 1264, c. 1496, forbidding receipt for transportation of livestock from quarantined points in any state or territory into any other state or territory do not apply to the receipt of livestock by a connecting carrier for transportation wholly within the state in which it is received, even though the shipment originated at a quarantined point in another state.

The facts, which involve the construction of the Cattle Quarantine Act of March 3, 1905, 33 Stat. 1264, are stated in the opinion.

Page 222 U. S. 11

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.