Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)
U.S. Supreme Court
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Scott
No. 286
Argued October 19, 20, 1910
Decided January 3, 1911
219 U.S. 209
Syllabus
Decided on authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, ante, p. 219 U. S. 186.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Scott
No. 286
Argued October 19, 20, 1910
Decided January 3, 1911
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
Decided on authority of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, ante, p. 219 U. S. 186.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE LURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. Like that case, it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack Amendment of the Act to Regulate Commerce.
The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.
Affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.