Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

U.S. Supreme Court

Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

Griffith v. Connecticut

No. 515

Motion to dismiss or affirm

Submitted November 28, 1910

Decided December 12, 1910

218 U.S. 572

Syllabus

Decided on authority of Griffith v. Connecticut, ante, p. 218 U. S. 563.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

U.S. Supreme Court

Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

Griffith v. Connecticut

No. 515

Motion to dismiss or affirm

Submitted November 28, 1910

Decided December 12, 1910

218 U.S. 572

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS

OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Syllabus

Decided on authority of Griffith v. Connecticut, ante, p. 218 U. S. 563.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE White delivered the opinion of the Court.

The parties to this record are the same as in No. 514, just decided, ante, p. 218 U. S. 563, and the questions involved are the same, the prosecution being for similar offenses against the Connecticut Act of 1907. Both cases were tried together. Upon the conviction in this, however, the trial court imposed the penalty of imprisonment. The two cases were disposed of by the Supreme Court of Errors in one opinion. As the decision in No. 514 is necessarily controlling, it follows that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut must be, and it is,

Affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.