AMERICAN NAT BANK OF WASHINGTON v. TAPPAN, 217 U.S. 600 (1910)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN NAT BANK OF WASHINGTON v. TAPPAN, 217 U.S. 600 (1910)

217 U.S. 600

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FANNIE N. TAPPAN.
No. 837.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1910

Page 217 U.S. 600, 601

Messrs. Horace B. Stanton and Benjamin S. Minor for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Alexander Wolf for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, without opinion.


U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN NAT BANK OF WASHINGTON v. TAPPAN, 217 U.S. 600 (1910)

 217 U.S. 600

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FANNIE N. TAPPAN.
No. 837.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1910

Page 217 U.S. 600, 601

Messrs. Horace B. Stanton and Benjamin S. Minor for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Alexander Wolf for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, without opinion.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.