BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
216 U.S. 617
BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.
Nos. 124, 125.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 14, 1910
Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.
Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
U.S. Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.
Nos. 124, 125.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 14, 1910
Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Page 216 U.S. 617, 618
Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.
Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.