BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)

U.S. Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)

216 U.S. 617

BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.

Nos. 124, 125.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1910

Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Page 216 U.S. 617, 618

Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.

Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.


U.S. Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S, 216 U.S. 617 (1910)

216 U.S. 617

BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
UNITED STATES.

Nos. 124, 125.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1910

Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Page 216 U.S. 617, 618

Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.

Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.