SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)

216 U.S. 609

JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

No 383.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 7, 1910

Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.

Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.

Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)  216 U.S. 609

JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

No 383.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 7, 1910

Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.

Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.

Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]