SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)
216 U.S. 609
JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.
No 383.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 7, 1910
Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.
Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.
Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)
JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.
No 383.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 7, 1910
Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.
Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.
Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.