SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)216 U.S. 609
JAMES A. SHINE et al.,
Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.
No 383.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 7, 1910
Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.
Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.
Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we
are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from
the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore
dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]
Opinions
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. No 383. Supreme Court of the United States March 7, 1910 Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants. Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee. Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910) 216 U.S. 609 JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. No 383. Supreme Court of the United States March 7, 1910 Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants. Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee. Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]
Search This Case
