Franklin v. United States
Annotate this Case
216 U.S. 559 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court
Franklin v. United States, 216 U.S. 559 (1910)
Franklin v. United States
Submitted February 21, 1910
Decided March 14, 1910
216 U.S. 559
The sixty-second article of war does not vest, nor purport to vest, exclusive jurisdiction in courts-martial, and civil courts have concurrent jurisdiction over all offenses committed by a military officer which may be punished under the provisions of that article. The effect of § 3 of the Acts of March 3, 1825, c. 65, 4 Stat. 115; April 5, 1866, c. 24, 14 Stat. 13, carried forward in 5391, Rev.Stat., and July 7, 1898, c. 576, 30 Stat. 717, providing that the punishment of offenses in places ceded by the state to the United States not specially provided for by any law of the United States shall be the same as that provided for by the law of the state ceding the place where the offense was committed, is limited to the criminal laws in force in the several states at the time of the enactment of the legislation, and those statutes do not delegate to such states authority to in any way change the criminal law of the United States. United States v. Paul, 6 Pet. 141.
Jurisdiction of this Court under the act of 1891 of a direct appeal from the court of appeals cannot be based on constitutional points that are absolutely unfounded in substance, as in this case.
Three indictments were returned against plaintiff in error by the grand jury in the Southern District of New York. In the first of said indictments, he was charged with the embezzlement
of certain personal property of the cadets at the United States Military Academy, upon a government reservation, to-wit, the West Point Military Reservation, in the Southern District of New York, in violation of § 5391, Rev.Stat., as amended by the Act of July 7, 1898, and of §§ 528 and 531 of the New York Penal Code.
In the second indictment, he was charged with making and presenting to an officer of the Army for approval false claims upon the government of the United States for supplies furnished to the cadet mess at West Point, in violation of § 5438, Rev.Stat., and in the third indictment, he was charged with making and presenting to an officer of the Army, for approval and for payment, a false claim upon the United States War Department, and upon the treasurer of the United States Military Academy in violation of § 5438, Rev.Stat..
Demurrers to the indictments were overruled and they were then consolidated. The first of said indictments contained six counts, in three of which plaintiff in error was charged with grand larceny in the second degree, under the New York Penal Code, and in the other three he was charged with embezzlement of the same funds, in violation of the New York Penal Code; but the first three of said counts were nolle prossed. The defendant thereupon pleaded guilty to all three of the indictments; but before judgment was pronounced, he moved in arrest of judgment, the grounds of his motion being as follows:
"1. Because the said fourth, fifth, and sixth counts of the indictment against the said defendant for grand larceny under section 2, chapter 576, Act of July 7, 1898, to and of which the defendant pleaded and was found guilty, do not, nor does any one of the said counts, charge a criminal offense under the laws of the United States."
"2. Because the said section 2, chapter 576, of an Act of Congress approved July 7, 1898, entitled, 'An Act to Protect the Harbor Defenses and Fortifications Constructed or Used by the United States from Malicious Injury, and for Other Purposes,' is unconstitutional and void. "
"3. Because, by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, this Court here has no jurisdiction of the offense alleged to have been committed by this defendant in said fourth, fifth, and sixth counts of the said indictments, because he says the said section 2, chapter 576, of the said Act of Congress approved July 7, 1898, confers upon this Court here no jurisdiction of this cause, nor any legal power to hear, try, and determine the same, inasmuch as the punishment for the offense alleged in said indictment, and in each and every count thereof, when committed by the treasurer of the United States Military Academy, an officer of the Army of the United States, is provided for by § 1342, Rev.Stat. of the United States, and inasmuch as, by the said Constitution and laws, exclusive jurisdiction over said offense, when committed by a person subject to military jurisdiction, is vested in the properly constituted and authorized courts-martial of the United States."
"4. Because the facts alleged in said counts under § 5438, Rev.Stat. of the United States, do not, as alleged in said counts, or in any one of them, charge a criminal offense against the United States."
This motion was overruled, and defendant was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of two and one-half years in the United States penitentiary at Atlanta; and, errors being assigned which raised the questions presented in the motion in arrest of judgment, the case was removed to this Court by writ of error.
The statutes under which said indictments were found are as follows:
1. Section 2 of the Act of July 7, 1898, 30 Stat. 717, c. 576:
"That when any offense is committed in any place, jurisdiction over which has been retained by the United States or ceded to it by a state, or which has been purchased with the consent of a state for the erection of a fort, magazine, arsenal, dockyard, or other needful building or structure, the punishment for which offense is not provided for by any law of the
United States, the person committing such offense shall, upon conviction, in a circuit or district court of the United States for the district in which the offense was committed, be liable to and receive the same punishment as the laws of the state in which such place is situated now provide for the like offense when committed within the jurisdiction of such state, and the said courts are hereby vested with jurisdiction for such purpose, and no subsequent repeal of any such state law shall affect any such prosecution."
2. Sections 528 and 531 of the Penal Code of New York:
"SEC. 528. A person who, with the intent to deprive or defraud the true owner of his property, or of the use and benefit thereof, or to appropriate the same to the use of the taker, or of any other person --"
"1. Takes from the possession of the true owner, or of any other person; or obtains from such possession by color or aid of fraudulent or false representation or pretense, or of any false token or writing, or secretes, withholds, or appropriates to his own use, or that of any person other than the true owner, any money, personal property, thing in action, evidence of debt or contract, or article of value of any kind, or,"
"2. Having in his possession, custody, or control, as a bailee, servant, attorney, agent, clerk, trustee, or officer of any person, association, or corporation, or as a public officer, or as a person authorized by agreement or by competent authority, to hold or take such possession, custody, or control, any money, property, evidence of debt or contract, article of value of any nature, or thing in action or possession, appropriates the same to his own use, or that of any other person other than the true owner or person entitled to the benefit thereof, steals such property, and is guilty of larceny."
"* * * *"
"SEC. 531. A person is guilty of grand larceny in the second degree, who, under circumstances not amounting to grand larceny in the first degree, in any manner specified in this article, steals or unlawfully obtains or appropriates: "
"1. Property of the value of more than $25, but not exceeding $500, in any manner whatever, or"
"2. Property of any value, by taking the same from the person of another, or"
"3. A record of a court or officer, or a writing, instrument, or record kept, filed, or deposited according to law, with, or in keeping of, any public office or officer."
3. Section 5438, Rev.Stat., so far as applicable to these indictments:
"Every person who makes or causes to be made, or presents or causes to be presented, for payment or approval, to or by any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, any claim upon or against the government of the United States, or any department or officer thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, or who, for the purpose of obtaining or aiding to obtain the payment or approval of such claim, makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, any false bill, receipt, voucher, roll, account, claim, certificate, affidavit, or deposition, knowing the same to contain any fraudulent or fictitious statement or entry . . . every person so offending in any of the matters set forth in this section shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than one nor more than five years, or fined not less than one thousand nor more than five thousand dollars."
Messrs. Holmes Conrad and S. T. Ansell for plaintiff in error.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.