MILLS v. JOHNSON, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLS v. JOHNSON, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

215 U.S. 590

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.
No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446, 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78, 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405, 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.


U.S. Supreme Court

MILLS v. JOHNSON, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

215 U.S. 590

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.
No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446, 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78, 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405, 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.