KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

215 U.S. 589

KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
HENRY S. JULIAN.
No. 85.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1909

Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 39 L. ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307, 308 S., 47 L. ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186

Page 215 U.S. 589, 590

Mo. 701, 85 S. W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709.

The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases.

The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30, 48 L. ed. 604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322, 53 L. ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.


U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

215 U.S. 589

KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
HENRY S. JULIAN.
No. 85.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1909

Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 39 L. ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307, 308 S., 47 L. ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186

Page 215 U.S. 589, 590

Mo. 701, 85 S. W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709.

The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases.

The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30, 48 L. ed. 604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322, 53 L. ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.