GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)
215 U.S. 587
GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al.
No. 607.
Supreme Court of the United States
November 15, 1909
Messrs. Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles, and John C. Spooner for appellant.
Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin, Arthur H. Masten, Bronson Winthrop, Frank H. Platt, James Byrne, and Matthew C. Fleming for appellees.
Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.S. 170, 37 L. Ed. 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 63; Re Lennon, 150 U.S. 393, 37 L. Ed. 1120, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Cornell v. Green, 163 U.S. 75, 41 L. Ed. 76, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 969; Empire State- Idanho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 51 L. Ed. 779, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 53 L. Ed. 914, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U.S. 89, 50 L. Ed. 101, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.S. 225, 48 L. Ed. 159, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; United States v. Larkin, 208 U.S. 333, 52 L. Ed. 517, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, 208 U.S. 360, 52 L. Ed. 528, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, 13 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1155; Bien v. Robinson, 208 U.S. 423, 52 L. Ed. 556, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 379; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U.S. 324, 52 L. Ed. 1080, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 732; and see Re Metropolitan R. Receivership (Re Reisenberg) 208 U.S. 90, 52 L. Ed. 403, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 166 Fed. 569, 168 Fed. 937, 170 Fed. 335, 625, 626, 171 Fed. 1014, 1015, 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. R. Co. 171 Fed. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 623.[ Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. Metropolitan St Ry Co 215 U.S. 587 (1909) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)
GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al.
No. 607.
Supreme Court of the United States
November 15, 1909
Messrs. Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles, and John C. Spooner for appellant.
Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin, Arthur H. Masten, Bronson Winthrop, Frank H. Platt, James Byrne, and Matthew C. Fleming for appellees.
Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.S. 170, 37 L. Ed. 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 63; Re Lennon, 150 U.S. 393, 37 L. Ed. 1120, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Cornell v. Green, 163 U.S. 75, 41 L. Ed. 76, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 969; Empire State- Idanho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 51 L. Ed. 779, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 53 L. Ed. 914, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U.S. 89, 50 L. Ed. 101, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.S. 225, 48 L. Ed. 159, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; United States v. Larkin, 208 U.S. 333, 52 L. Ed. 517, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, 208 U.S. 360, 52 L. Ed. 528, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, 13 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1155; Bien v. Robinson, 208 U.S. 423, 52 L. Ed. 556, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 379; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U.S. 324, 52 L. Ed. 1080, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 732; and see Re Metropolitan R. Receivership (Re Reisenberg) 208 U.S. 90, 52 L. Ed. 403, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 166 Fed. 569, 168 Fed. 937, 170 Fed. 335, 625, 626, 171 Fed. 1014, 1015, 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. R. Co. 171 Fed. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 623.[ Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. Metropolitan St Ry Co 215 U.S. 587 (1909) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.