GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)

215 U.S. 587

GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al.
No. 607.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1909

Messrs. Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles, and John C. Spooner for appellant.

Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin, Arthur H. Masten, Bronson Winthrop, Frank H. Platt, James Byrne, and Matthew C. Fleming for appellees.

Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.S. 170, 37 L. ed. 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 63; Re Lennon, 150 U.S. 393, 37 L. ed. 1120, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Cornell v. Green, 163 U.S. 75, 41 L. ed. 76, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 969; Empire State- Idanho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 51 L. ed. 779, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 53 L. ed. 914, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U.S. 89, 50 L. ed. 101, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.S. 225, 48 L. ed. 159, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; United States v. Larkin, 208 U.S. 333, 52 L. ed. 517, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, 208 U.S. 360, 52 L. ed. 528, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, 13 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1155; Bien v. Robinson, 208 U.S. 423, 52 L. ed. 556, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 379; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U.S. 324, 52 L. ed. 1080, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 732; and see Re Metropolitan R. Receivership (Re Reisenberg) 208 U.S. 90, 52 L. ed. 403, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 166 Fed. 569, 168 Fed. 937, 170 Fed. 335, 625, 626, 171 Fed. 1014, 1015, 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. R. Co. 171 Fed. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 623.[ Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. Metropolitan St Ry Co 215 U.S. 587 (1909) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)

215 U.S. 587

GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al.
No. 607.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1909

Messrs. Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles, and John C. Spooner for appellant.

Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin, Arthur H. Masten, Bronson Winthrop, Frank H. Platt, James Byrne, and Matthew C. Fleming for appellees.

Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.S. 170, 37 L. ed. 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 63; Re Lennon, 150 U.S. 393, 37 L. ed. 1120, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Cornell v. Green, 163 U.S. 75, 41 L. ed. 76, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 969; Empire State- Idanho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 51 L. ed. 779, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 53 L. ed. 914, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U.S. 89, 50 L. ed. 101, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.S. 225, 48 L. ed. 159, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; United States v. Larkin, 208 U.S. 333, 52 L. ed. 517, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, 208 U.S. 360, 52 L. ed. 528, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, 13 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1155; Bien v. Robinson, 208 U.S. 423, 52 L. ed. 556, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 379; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U.S. 324, 52 L. ed. 1080, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 732; and see Re Metropolitan R. Receivership (Re Reisenberg) 208 U.S. 90, 52 L. ed. 403, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 166 Fed. 569, 168 Fed. 937, 170 Fed. 335, 625, 626, 171 Fed. 1014, 1015, 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. R. Co. 171 Fed. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 623.[ Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. Metropolitan St Ry Co 215 U.S. 587 (1909) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.