ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
214 U.S. 497
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY and Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.
April 26, 1909.
Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U.S. 583, 52 L. Ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY and Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.
April 26, 1909.
Page 214 U.S. 497, 498
Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U.S. 583, 52 L. Ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
