THOMAS v. SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED R CO, 214 U.S. 496 (1909)

U.S. Supreme Court

THOMAS v. SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED R CO, 214 U.S. 496 (1909)

214 U.S. 496

GEORGE W. THOMAS, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 157.

April 26, 1909

Mr. George W. Thomas, in propria persona.

Messrs. Monroe L. Willard and Cecil Page for defendant in error.

Page 214 U.S. 496, 497

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stevens v. Nichols, 157 U.S. 370, 39 L. Ed. 736, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 640; Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 37 L. Ed. 856, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103, 40 L. Ed. 91, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; A. Backus, Jr ., & Sons v. Fort Street Union Depot Co. 169 U.S. 557, 42 L. Ed. 853, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 445; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U.S. 241, 51 L. Ed. 461, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 261; Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U.S. 170, 51 L. Ed. 755, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 461; Rusch v. John Duncan Land & Min. Co. 211 U.S. 526, 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 172.


U.S. Supreme Court

THOMAS v. SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED R CO, 214 U.S. 496 (1909)

 214 U.S. 496

GEORGE W. THOMAS, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
SOUTH SIDE ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 157.

April 26, 1909

Mr. George W. Thomas, in propria persona.

Messrs. Monroe L. Willard and Cecil Page for defendant in error.

Page 214 U.S. 496, 497

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stevens v. Nichols, 157 U.S. 370, 39 L. Ed. 736, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 640; Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 37 L. Ed. 856, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103, 40 L. Ed. 91, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; A. Backus, Jr ., & Sons v. Fort Street Union Depot Co. 169 U.S. 557, 42 L. Ed. 853, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 445; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U.S. 241, 51 L. Ed. 461, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 261; Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U.S. 170, 51 L. Ed. 755, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 461; Rusch v. John Duncan Land & Min. Co. 211 U.S. 526, 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 172.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.