VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)
212 U.S. 568
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH
No. 457.
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
O. M. WOOD
No. 473.
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159, 48 S. L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339, 50 L. Ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80, 50 L. Ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73, 51 S. L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.
U.S. Supreme Court
VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH
No. 457.
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
O. M. WOOD
No. 473.
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909
Page 212 U.S. 568, 569 Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159, 48 S. L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339, 50 L. Ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80, 50 L. Ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73, 51 S. L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.