CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, 212 U.S. 567 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, 212 U.S. 567 (1909)
212 U.S. 567
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
AETNA NATIONAL BANK
No. 75.
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD
No. 76.
January 25, 1909.
Messrs. William Waldo Hyde and Charles Welles Gross for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Gardiner Greene, Frank T. Browne, and Charles E. Serles for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516, 51 L. Ed. 1163, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.
U.S. Supreme Court
CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, 212 U.S. 567 (1909)
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
AETNA NATIONAL BANK
No. 75.
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD
No. 76.
January 25, 1909.
Page 212 U.S. 567, 568 Messrs. William Waldo Hyde and Charles Welles Gross for plaintiff in error.Messrs. Gardiner Greene, Frank T. Browne, and Charles E. Serles for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516, 51 L. Ed. 1163, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.
