CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK,
212 U.S. 567 (1909)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, 212 U.S. 567 (1909)
212 U.S. 567
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
AETNA NATIONAL BANK
No. 75.
THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD
No. 76.
January 25, 1909.
Messrs. William Waldo Hyde and Charles Welles Gross for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Gardiner Greene, Frank T. Browne, and Charles E. Serles for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516, 51 L. ed. 1163, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
