SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER CO. v. MADSON, 212 U.S. 565 (1909)

U.S. Supreme Court

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER CO. v. MADSON, 212 U.S. 565 (1909)

212 U.S. 565

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
R. Madson and Anna C. Madson, His Wife
No. 202.

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
R. Madson and Anna Madson

No. 231.

January 25, 1909

Mr. Albert Allen for plaintiff in error.

Mr. S. C. Hyde for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hardin v. Shedd, 190 U.S. 508, 47 L. Ed. 1156, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 685; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 47 L. Ed. 480, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U.S. 275, 50 L. Ed. 1026, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 617; Madson v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. 40 Wash. 414, 6 L.R.A. ( N.S.) 257, 82 Pac. 718, 46 Wash. 640, 91 Pac. 1.[ Spokane Valley Land & Water Co v. Madson 212 U.S. 565 (1909) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER CO. v. MADSON, 212 U.S. 565 (1909)

 212 U.S. 565

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
R. Madson and Anna C. Madson, His Wife
No. 202.

SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
R. Madson and Anna Madson

No. 231.

January 25, 1909

Mr. Albert Allen for plaintiff in error.

Mr. S. C. Hyde for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hardin v. Shedd, 190 U.S. 508, 47 L. Ed. 1156, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 685; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 47 L. Ed. 480, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U.S. 275, 50 L. Ed. 1026, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 617; Madson v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. 40 Wash. 414, 6 L.R.A. ( N.S.) 257, 82 Pac. 718, 46 Wash. 640, 91 Pac. 1.[ Spokane Valley Land & Water Co v. Madson 212 U.S. 565 (1909) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.