CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)

212 U.S. 563

CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.

JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 239.

FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 240.

January 4, 1909

Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.

Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)

 212 U.S. 563

CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.

JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 239.

FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 240.

January 4, 1909

Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.

Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.