CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)212 U.S. 563
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.
JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 239.
FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 240.
January 4, 1909
Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.
Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to
the District Court of the United States for the Northern District
of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]
Opinions
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.
JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES No. 239. FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES No. 240. January 4, 1909 Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent. Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909) 212 U.S. 563 CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.
JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES No. 239. FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES No. 240. January 4, 1909 Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent. Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]
Search This Case
