CLEVENGER v. CHANEY, 212 U.S. 562 (1908)

U.S. Supreme Court

CLEVENGER v. CHANEY, 212 U.S. 562 (1908)

212 U.S. 562

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
ALLEN CHANEY.
No. 221.

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
JAMES D. LYLE.

No. 222.

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
EMILY M. NICHOLS.

No. 223.

December 14, 1908

Messrs. E. E. Clevenger and Cook Danford for appellant.

Mr. A. H. Mitchell for appellees.

Per Curiam: Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Applications for Certiorari denied. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U.S. 89, 52 L. Ed. 116, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32.


U.S. Supreme Court

CLEVENGER v. CHANEY, 212 U.S. 562 (1908)

 212 U.S. 562

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
ALLEN CHANEY.
No. 221.

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
JAMES D. LYLE.

No. 222.

E. E. CLEVENGER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant,
v.
EMILY M. NICHOLS.

No. 223.

December 14, 1908

Messrs. E. E. Clevenger and Cook Danford for appellant.

Mr. A. H. Mitchell for appellees.

Per Curiam: Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Applications for Certiorari denied. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U.S. 89, 52 L. Ed. 116, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.