Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 90 (1908)

U.S. Supreme Court

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 90 (1908)

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway

Company v. United States

No. 552

Submitted January 22, 1908

Decided March 16, 1908

209 U.S. 90

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of Armour Packing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 209 U. S. 66.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

U.S. Supreme Court

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 90 (1908)

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway

Company v. United States

No. 552

Submitted January 22, 1908

Decided March 16, 1908

209 U.S. 90

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of Armour Packing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 209 U. S. 66.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The counsel for the petitioner and the Solicitor General for the United States having filed a stipulation in writing in this cause, agreeing to abide the result of the Packing Company cases, just decided (Nos. 467, 468, 469, and 470), it is hereby ordered that the judgment of the circuit court of appeals in this case be affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MOODY took no part in the disposition of this case.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.