Stickney v. Kelsey,
209 U.S. 419 (1908)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Stickney v. Kelsey, 209 U.S. 419 (1908)

Stickney v. Kelsey

No. 16

Submitted March 20, 1908

Decided April 6, 1908

209 U.S. 419


A ruling by the highest court of the state sustaining the method of proving the existence of a law of that state presents no federal question.

Where the language of the appellate court is ambiguous, if it may be taken as a declination to pass upon a question not necessary to the decision, this Court will not, in order to aid a technical and nonmeritorious defense, spell out a federal question, but it will resolve the ambiguity against the plaintiff in error who is bound, in order to give this Court jurisdiction, to clearly show that a federal right has been impaired.

Writ of error to review 185 N.Y. 107 dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.