PENNSYLVANIA COAL & COKE CO. v. CASSATT, 207 U.S. 187 (1907)

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA COAL & COKE CO. v. CASSATT, 207 U.S. 187 (1907)

207 U.S. 187

PENNSYLVANIA COAL & COKE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
A. J. CASSATT, John B. Thayer, charles E. Pugh, et al.
No. 284.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 28, 29, 1907

December 2, 1907

Messrs. John W. Griggs, Benjamin S. Harmon, david L. Krebs, and George S. Graham for petitioner.

Messrs. John G. Johnson and Francis I. Gowen for respondents.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:

For the reasons given in the preceding case the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with a direction to dismiss the writ of error.[ Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co v. Cassatt 207 U.S. 187 (1907) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA COAL & COKE CO. v. CASSATT, 207 U.S. 187 (1907)

 207 U.S. 187

PENNSYLVANIA COAL & COKE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
A. J. CASSATT, John B. Thayer, charles E. Pugh, et al.
No. 284.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 28, 29, 1907

December 2, 1907

Messrs. John W. Griggs, Benjamin S. Harmon, david L. Krebs, and George S. Graham for petitioner.

Messrs. John G. Johnson and Francis I. Gowen for respondents.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:

For the reasons given in the preceding case the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with a direction to dismiss the writ of error.[ Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co v. Cassatt 207 U.S. 187 (1907) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.