Tinsley v. Treat,
205 U.S. 20 (1907)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Tinsley v. Treat, 205 U.S. 20 (1907)

Tinsley v. Treat

No. 369

Argued December 3, 4, 1906

Decided March 4, 1907

205 U.S. 20


A district judge of the United States, on application to remove from the district where defendant is arrested to that where the offense is triable, acts judicially, and the provision of § 1014, Rev.Stat., that the proceedings are to be conducted agreeably to the usual mode of process in the state against offenders has no application to the inquiry on application for removal.

While in a removal proceeding under § 1014, Rev.Stat., an indictment constitutes prima facie evidence of probable cause, it is not conclusive, and evidence offered by the defendant tending to show that no offense triable in the district to which removal is sought had been committed is admissible, and its exclusion is not mere error, but the denial of a right secured under the federal Constitution.

Page 205 U. S. 21

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 205 U. S. 24

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.