Martin v. District of Columbia,
205 U.S. 135 (1907)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Martin v. District of Columbia, 205 U.S. 135 (1907)

Martin v. District of Columbia

No, 190, 191

Argued January 29, 1907

Decided March 11, 1907

205 U.S. 135


Constitutional rights, like others, are matters of degree, and a street opening statute which has stood for a long time will not be declared unconstitutional as taking property without compensation because, in a particular instance, the amount assessed under the strict letter of the statute exceeded the value of the property, but the statute should be so interpreted, as is possible in this case, so that the apportionment of damages be limited to the benefit.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 205 U. S. 137

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.