OSWALD v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 2 U.S. 401 (1792)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

OSWALD v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 2 U.S. 401 (1792)

2 U.S. 401 (Dall.)

Oswald, Administrator
v.
the State of New York

February Term, 1792

Summons. In this case the Marshall had returned the writ served; and now Sergeant moved for a distringas, to compel an appearance on the part of the State.

While, however, the court held the motion under advisement, it was voluntarily withdrawn, and the suit discontinued.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] But see the same suit post, and Grayfen versus Virginia.[ Oswald v. State of New York

Footnote 2 U.S. 401 (1792) ]




U.S. Supreme Court

OSWALD v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 2 U.S. 401 (1792)

2 U.S. 401 (Dall.)

Oswald, Administrator
v.
the State of New York

February Term, 1792

Summons. In this case the Marshall had returned the writ served; and now Sergeant moved for a distringas, to compel an appearance on the part of the State.

While, however, the court held the motion under advisement, it was voluntarily withdrawn, and the suit discontinued.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] But see the same suit post, and Grayfen versus Virginia.[ Oswald v. State of New York

Footnote 2 U.S. 401 (1792) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.