BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)

2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302

Brudenell et al.
v.
Vaux et. al.

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District

April Term, 1794

The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended.

Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.


U.S. Supreme Court

BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)

2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302

Brudenell et al.
v.
Vaux et. al.

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District

April Term, 1794

The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended.

Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.