BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX,
2 U.S. 302 (1794)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)
2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302
Brudenell et al.
v.
Vaux et. al.
Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District
April Term, 1794
The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended.
Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
