BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302
Brudenell et al.
v.
Vaux et. al.
Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District
April Term, 1794
The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended.
Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, &
Thomas, for the defendant.
Opinions
v.
Vaux et. al. Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District April Term, 1794 The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended. Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794) 2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302 Brudenell et al.v.
Vaux et. al. Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District April Term, 1794 The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended. Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.
Search This Case
