ZANTZINGER v. OLD, 2 U.S. 265 (1796)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ZANTZINGER v. OLD, 2 U.S. 265 (1796)

2 U.S. 265 (Dall.)

Zantzinger
v.
Old

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1796

A Testatum Ca. Sa. had issued to the Sheriff of Lancaster, upon which the party was arrested, and the money paid. But the Sheriff paid it over to the nominal, instead of the real, plaintiff, tho' the indorsement for the use, &c. was on the writ. At the last term, Hallowell obtained a rule to return the Test. Ca. Sa. or to shew cause this day, why an attachment should not issue against the sheriff; and now, upon proof of service of the rule, he moved that the attachment should be awarded.

By the Court; Let the attachment issue, returnable the last day of the term.


U.S. Supreme Court

ZANTZINGER v. OLD, 2 U.S. 265 (1796)

 2 U.S. 265 (Dall.)

Zantzinger
v.
Old

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1796

A Testatum Ca. Sa. had issued to the Sheriff of Lancaster, upon which the party was arrested, and the money paid. But the Sheriff paid it over to the nominal, instead of the real, plaintiff, tho' the indorsement for the use, &c. was on the writ. At the last term, Hallowell obtained a rule to return the Test. Ca. Sa. or to shew cause this day, why an attachment should not issue against the sheriff; and now, upon proof of service of the rule, he moved that the attachment should be awarded.

By the Court; Let the attachment issue, returnable the last day of the term.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.