KNOX v. JONES, 2 U.S. 193 (1792)

U.S. Supreme Court

KNOX v. JONES, 2 U.S. 193 (1792)

2 U.S. 193 (Dall.)

Knox et al.
v.
Jones*

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1792

This was an action on the case for goods sold and delivered; and the only question agitated upon the trial, was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover interest? It was proved, that at the time of the sale, the defendant was informed, that it was the course of the trade to give six months credit; or, if cash was paid, to discount five per cent; but that punctuality, and not interest, was the object of the plaintiffs.

By the Court: The established course of the plaintiffs' trade is proved; and, also, the knowledge of the defendant.

Page 2 U.S. 193, 194

It appears, therefore, to be a part of their contract, that interest should commence, at the expiration of the six months credit.

Verdict accordingly.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] This case was decided at Philadelphia, Nisi Prius, held in November, 1792, before the Chief Justice, Shippen and Bradford, Justices.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

KNOX v. JONES, 2 U.S. 193 (1792)

 2 U.S. 193 (Dall.)

Knox et al.
v.
Jones*

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1792

This was an action on the case for goods sold and delivered; and the only question agitated upon the trial, was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover interest? It was proved, that at the time of the sale, the defendant was informed, that it was the course of the trade to give six months credit; or, if cash was paid, to discount five per cent; but that punctuality, and not interest, was the object of the plaintiffs.

By the Court: The established course of the plaintiffs' trade is proved; and, also, the knowledge of the defendant.

Page 2 U.S. 193, 194

It appears, therefore, to be a part of their contract, that interest should commence, at the expiration of the six months credit.

Verdict accordingly.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] This case was decided at Philadelphia, Nisi Prius, held in November, 1792, before the Chief Justice, Shippen and Bradford, Justices.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.