GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)
U.S. Supreme Court
GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)
2 U.S. 191 (Dall.)
Grubb's Executors
v.
Grubb's Executors
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
September Term, 1792
This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court.
But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them.
And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRUBB'S EX'RS v. GRUBB'S EX'RS, 2 U.S. 191 (1792)
2 U.S. 191 (Dall.)
Grubb's Executors
v.
Grubb's Executors
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
September Term, 1792
This cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court.
Page 2 U.S. 191, 192
But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them.
And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.