DUFFIELD v. STILLE, 2 U.S. 156 (1792)

U.S. Supreme Court

DUFFIELD v. STILLE, 2 U.S. 156 (1792)

2 U.S. 156 (Dall.)

Duffield
v.
Stille

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

March Term, 1792

This was an action for mesne profits, after a recovery in ejectment. It appeared, that subsequent to that recovery, the plaintiff had conveyed the fee simple of the premises to the defendant, in the usual manner, by deed of bargain and sale, with a special warranty: And two questions were made for the opinion of the Court 1st. Whether, after the conveyance in fee simple, the plaintiff could maintain this action? 2nd. Whether the deed was not, in law, a release of the mesne profits?

For the defendant were cited, Freem. 365. Bro. Ass. 62. S. 369. 359. 8 Co. 154. a Litt. 508. But, By the Court: The case is clearly with the plaintiff.

Let there be Judgment accordingly.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Bradford, Justice: Having been counsel for the plaintiff, I give no opinion in the decision of the cause.[ Duffield v. Stille

Footnote 2 U.S. 156 (1792) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DUFFIELD v. STILLE, 2 U.S. 156 (1792)

 2 U.S. 156 (Dall.)

Duffield
v.
Stille

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

March Term, 1792

This was an action for mesne profits, after a recovery in ejectment. It appeared, that subsequent to that recovery, the plaintiff had conveyed the fee simple of the premises to the defendant, in the usual manner, by deed of bargain and sale, with a special warranty: And two questions were made for the opinion of the Court 1st. Whether, after the conveyance in fee simple, the plaintiff could maintain this action? 2nd. Whether the deed was not, in law, a release of the mesne profits?

For the defendant were cited, Freem. 365. Bro. Ass. 62. S. 369. 359. 8 Co. 154. a Litt. 508. But, By the Court: The case is clearly with the plaintiff.

Let there be Judgment accordingly.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Bradford, Justice: Having been counsel for the plaintiff, I give no opinion in the decision of the cause.[ Duffield v. Stille

Footnote 2 U.S. 156 (1792) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.