SECUNDINO MENDEZONA Y MENDEZONA v. U S, 195 U.S. 158 (1904)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SECUNDINO MENDEZONA Y MENDEZONA v. U S, 195 U.S. 158 (1904)

195 U.S. 158

SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA, Plff. in Err.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 584.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 21, 22, 1904

May 31, 1904

No brief or argument for plaintiff in error.

Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Lebbens R. Wilfley for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves the question just decided in Kepner v. United States, 194 U. S. -, ante, 797, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 797. The plaintiff in error was acquitted in the court of first instance, and convicted in the supreme court of the Philippine Islands.

For the reasons stated in the Kepner Case, the judgment herein is reversed, and the prisoner discharged.

Dissenting: Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice McKenna, and Mr. Justice Holmes.


U.S. Supreme Court

SECUNDINO MENDEZONA Y MENDEZONA v. U S, 195 U.S. 158 (1904)

 195 U.S. 158

SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA, Plff. in Err.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 584.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 21, 22, 1904

May 31, 1904

No brief or argument for plaintiff in error.

Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Lebbens R. Wilfley for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves the question just decided in Kepner v. United States, 194 U. S. -, ante, 797, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 797. The plaintiff in error was acquitted in the court of first instance, and convicted in the supreme court of the Philippine Islands.

For the reasons stated in the Kepner Case, the judgment herein is reversed, and the prisoner discharged.

Dissenting: Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice McKenna, and Mr. Justice Holmes.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.