Burrell v. Montana,
194 U.S. 572 (1904)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Burrell v. Montana, 194 U.S. 572 (1904)

Burrell v. Montana

No. 218

Submitted April 13, 1904

Decided May 31, 1904

194 U.S. 572


A witness who voluntarily testifies cannot resist the effect of the testimony by claiming that he could not have been compelled to give it. The time to avail of a statutory protection is when the testimony is offered.

The provision in the Bankruptcy Act of July, 1898, requiring the bankrupt to testify before the referee, but providing that no testimony then given by him shall be offered in evidence against him in any criminal proceeding, does not amount to exemption from prosecution, nor does it deprive the evidence of its probative force after it has been admitted without objection in a criminal prosecution against the bankrupt in a state court.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Page 194 U. S. 575

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.