LOWE v. U S, 194 U.S. 193 (1904)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LOWE v. U S, 194 U.S. 193 (1904)194 U.S. 193
JOHN LOWE, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United
States
Argued April 8, 1904
April 25, 1904
Messrs. A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and Charles L. Fraliey for appellant.
Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. John Q. Thompson for appellee.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:
This case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of Gibson v. United States, 193 U. S. --, ante, 613, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 613.
For the reasons therein stated, The judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision
of this case.
Opinions
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 8, 1904 April 25, 1904 Messrs. A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and Charles L. Fraliey for appellant. Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. John Q. Thompson for appellee. Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court: This case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of Gibson v. United States, 193 U. S. --, ante, 613, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 613. For the reasons therein stated, The judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is affirmed. Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
LOWE v. U S, 194 U.S. 193 (1904) 194 U.S. 193 JOHN LOWE, Appt.,v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 8, 1904 April 25, 1904 Messrs. A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and Charles L. Fraliey for appellant. Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. John Q. Thompson for appellee. Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court: This case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of Gibson v. United States, 193 U. S. --, ante, 613, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 613. For the reasons therein stated, The judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is affirmed. Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Search This Case
