SECURITY LAND & EXPLORATION CO v. WECKEY, 193 U.S. 188 (1904)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SECURITY LAND & EXPLORATION CO v. WECKEY, 193 U.S. 188 (1904)

193 U.S. 188

SECURITY LAND & EXPLORATION COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,
v.
HENRY WECKEY et al.
No. 128.
 
Argued January 19, 1904.
Decided February 29, 1904.

Messrs. William W. Billson and Chester A. Congdon for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John R. Van Derlip, R. R. Briggs, and George P. Wilson for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Peckham delivered the opinion of the court:

Page 193 U.S. 188, 189

In this case land in the same section as in the foregoing case is involved, and as the title depends upon precisely the same facts, this case is, by stipulation of counsel, to abide the event of the other.

Judgment affirmed.


U.S. Supreme Court

SECURITY LAND & EXPLORATION CO v. WECKEY, 193 U.S. 188 (1904)

 193 U.S. 188

SECURITY LAND & EXPLORATION COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,
v.
HENRY WECKEY et al.
No. 128.
 
Argued January 19, 1904.
Decided February 29, 1904.

Messrs. William W. Billson and Chester A. Congdon for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John R. Van Derlip, R. R. Briggs, and George P. Wilson for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Peckham delivered the opinion of the court:

Page 193 U.S. 188, 189

In this case land in the same section as in the foregoing case is involved, and as the title depends upon precisely the same facts, this case is, by stipulation of counsel, to abide the event of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.