Cronin v. Denver, 192 U.S. 115 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court
Cronin v. Denver, 192 U.S. 115 (1904)Cronin v. Denver
No. 101
Argued December 16, 1903
Decided January 4, 1904
192 U.S. 115
Syllabus
Certain sections of an ordinance of the City of Denver, Colorado, as to the sale of liquor held not to be unconstitutional on the authority of Cronin v. Adams, ante, p. 192 U. S. 108.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
Cronin v. Denver, 192 U.S. 115 (1904)Cronin v. Denver
No. 101
Argued December 16, 1903
Decided January 4, 1904
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Syllabus
Certain sections of an ordinance of the City of Denver, Colorado, as to the sale of liquor held not to be unconstitutional on the authority of Cronin v. Adams, ante, p. 192 U. S. 108.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.
This action was brought in the Police Court of the City of
Denver, State of Colorado, to collect $500, for the violation of section 746 of Ordinance No. 101 of the city. Plaintiff in error was found guilty, and fined the sum of $50. On appeal to the county court, he was also found guilty, and fined $100. The judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state, and thereupon the chief justice of the state allowed this writ of error.
The case involves the constitutionality of sections 745 and 746 of the ordinance of the City of Denver. That question was passed upon in Cronin v. Adams, just decided, ante, p. 192 U. S. 108, and on its authority the judgment is
Affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.