Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903)

U.S. Supreme Court

Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903)

Northern Securities Company v. United States

No. 277

Submitted November 16, 1903

Decided November 30, 1903

191 U.S. 555

Syllabus

Motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae denied.

U.S. Supreme Court

Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903)

Northern Securities Company v. United States

No. 277

Submitted November 16, 1903

Decided November 30, 1903

191 U.S. 555

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Syllabus

Motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: In support of this motion, certain letters were presented showing that request was made of counsel for the respective parties for their consent to the application, and that they withheld direct consent, leaving the matter entirely to the Court to determine. When the motion was submitted, objection to the granting of leave was made by counsel for appellees.

Where, in a pending case, application to file briefs is made by counsel not employed therein, but interested in some other

Page 191 U. S. 556

pending case involving similar questions, and consent is given, the Court has always exercised great liberality in permitting this to be done. And doubtless it is within our discretion to allow it in any case when justified by the circumstances. Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 17; Florida v. Georgia, 17 How. 491; The Gray Jacket, 5 Wall. 370. It does not appear that applicant is interested in any other case which will be affected by the decision of this case, as the parties are represented by competent counsel, the need of assistance cannot be assumed and consent has not been given.

Leave to file must therefore be

Denied.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.