U S v. BARNETT, 189 U.S. 474 (1903)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

U S v. BARNETT, 189 U.S. 474 (1903)

189 U.S. 474

UNITED STATES, Appt.,
v.
PETER W. BARNETT.
No. 235.

Argued and submitted April 15, 1903.
Decided April 27, 1903.

Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Franklin W. Collins for appellant.

Messrs. George A. King and William B. King for appellee.

Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

This is the case of an enlisted man who makes a claim similar to the above, under Rev. Stat. 1290 (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 916), as amended. He was discharged on his own application, and the order of discharge stated that he was not entitled to travel pay. The foregoing reasoning also governs this case.

Judgment reversed.


U.S. Supreme Court

U S v. BARNETT, 189 U.S. 474 (1903)

189 U.S. 474

UNITED STATES, Appt.,
v.
PETER W. BARNETT.
No. 235.

Argued and submitted April 15, 1903.
Decided April 27, 1903.

Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Franklin W. Collins for appellant.

Messrs. George A. King and William B. King for appellee.

Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

This is the case of an enlisted man who makes a claim similar to the above, under Rev. Stat. 1290 (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 916), as amended. He was discharged on his own application, and the order of discharge stated that he was not entitled to travel pay. The foregoing reasoning also governs this case.

Judgment reversed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.