PACIFIC COAST S S CO v. U S, 187 U.S. 454 (1903)

U.S. Supreme Court

PACIFIC COAST S S CO v. U S, 187 U.S. 454 (1903)

187 U.S. 454

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 29

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 30

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 31

Nos. 29, 30, 31.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 8, 1902

January 5, 1903

Messrs. S. M. Stockslager, George C. Heard, John R. Winn, and John G. Heid for appellant.

Solicitor General Richards and Assistant Attorney General Beck for the United States.

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

These three cases are substantially similar to the one just decided, and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein the orders of the District Court in each are affirmed.

The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the decision of these cases.[ Pacific Coast S S Co v. U S 187 U.S. 454 (1903) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

PACIFIC COAST S S CO v. U S, 187 U.S. 454 (1903)

187 U.S. 454

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 29

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 30

PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 31

Nos. 29, 30, 31.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 8, 1902

January 5, 1903

Messrs. S. M. Stockslager, George C. Heard, John R. Winn, and John G. Heid for appellant.

Solicitor General Richards and Assistant Attorney General Beck for the United States.

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

These three cases are substantially similar to the one just decided, and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein the orders of the District Court in each are affirmed.

The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the decision of these cases.[ Pacific Coast S S Co v. U S 187 U.S. 454 (1903) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.