Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham, 178 U.S. 610 (1900)

U.S. Supreme Court

Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham , 178 U.S. 610 (1900)

Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham (No. 2)

No. 604

Argued April 30, May 1, 1900

Decided May 21, 1900

178 U.S. 610

Syllabus

It results from the conclusions announced in No. 603, ante, 178 U. S. 548, that the writ of error in this case must be dismissed.

The facts affecting this case are stated in Taylor and.Marshall v. Beckham (No 1), ante, 178 U. S. 548. It was argued with that case, and by the same counsel.

U.S. Supreme Court

Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham , 178 U.S. 610 (1900)

Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham (No. 2)

No. 604

Argued April 30, May 1, 1900

Decided May 21, 1900

178 U.S. 610

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY

Syllabus

It results from the conclusions announced in No. 603, ante, 178 U. S. 548, that the writ of error in this case must be dismissed.

The facts affecting this case are stated in Taylor and.Marshall v. Beckham (No 1), ante, 178 U. S. 548. It was argued with that case, and by the same counsel.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER:

These were suits in equity brought by Taylor and Marshall against Beckham, and one Carter, asserting himself to be the president pro tempore of the Senate of Kentucky, with the right to preside over that body though Marshall was present, in which complainants prayed for injunctions restraining defendants from interfering with complainants in their offices. These suits were heard with the case of Beckham v. Taylor and Marshall, just decided. When the Circuit Court of Jefferson County reached the conclusion that Beckham was entitled to the office of Governor and entered judgment of ouster, it dismissed the suits. From the decrees appeals were taken to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, where they were affirmed, and thereafter a writ of error from this Court was allowed. It results from the conclusions announced in the preceding case that the writ of error must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA concurs in the result.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.