Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles, 177 U.S. 169 (1900)
U.S. Supreme Court
Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles, 177 U.S. 169 (1900)Chrystal Springs Land and Water Company v. Los Angeles
No. 41
Submitted March 15, 1900
Decided April 9, 1900
177 U.S. 169
Syllabus
Decree below affirmed on the authority of the cases named in the opinion of the Court.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
U.S. Supreme Court
Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles, 177 U.S. 169 (1900)Chrystal Springs Land and Water Company v. Los Angeles
No. 41
Submitted March 15, 1900
Decided April 9, 1900
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
Decree below affirmed on the authority of the cases named in the opinion of the Court.
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: Bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights, and works connected therewith. Bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified. Reported below, 82 F. 114; 76 F. 148.
Decree affirmed on authority of (1) Phillips v. Mound City Association, 124 U. S. 605; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 151 U. S. 395; New Orleans v. DeArmas, 9 Pet. 224; Borgmeyer v. Idler, 159 U. S. 408; Muse v. Arlington Hotel Company, 168 U. S. 430; (2) Robinson v. Anderson, 121 U. S. 522; Florida Central Railroad v. Bell, 176 U. S. 330; Gold Washing Company v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199; Tennessee v. Union and Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454; New Orleans v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411, 153 U. S. 424.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.