MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899)
175 U.S. 723 MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, Plaintiff in Error, November 6, 1899U.S. Supreme Court
MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899)
v.
J. M. EVANS.
No. 78.
Messrs. James Hagerman and J. M. Bryson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Rush Taggart and H. Chilton for defendant in error.
Dismissed with costs, on the authority of Mason v. United States, 136 U.S. 581, 34 L. Ed. 545, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1062; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179, 36 L. Ed. 933, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39; and Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U.S. 86, 39 L. Ed. 79, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.1
Footnotes
Footnote 1 See 29 C. C. A. 523, 86 Fed. Rep. 1.[ Missouri, K & T R Co v. Evans 175 U.S. 723 (1899) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899)
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
J. M. EVANS.
No. 78.
November 6, 1899
Messrs. James Hagerman and J. M. Bryson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Rush Taggart and H. Chilton for defendant in error.
Dismissed with costs, on the authority of Mason v. United States, 136 U.S. 581, 34 L. Ed. 545, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1062; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179, 36 L. Ed. 933, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39; and Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U.S. 86, 39 L. Ed. 79, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.1
Footnotes
Footnote 1 See 29 C. C. A. 523, 86 Fed. Rep. 1.[ Missouri, K & T R Co v. Evans 175 U.S. 723 (1899) ]
