MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899)
U.S. Supreme Court
MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899)175 U.S. 723
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY
COMPANY OF TEXAS, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
J. M. EVANS.
No. 78.
November 6, 1899
Messrs. James Hagerman and J. M. Bryson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Rush Taggart and H. Chilton for defendant in error.
Dismissed with costs, on the authority of Mason v. United States, 136 U.S. 581, 34 L. Ed. 545, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1062; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179, 36 L. Ed. 933, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39; and Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U.S. 86, 39 L. Ed. 79, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.1
FootnotesFootnote 1 See 29 C. C. A. 523, 86 Fed. Rep. 1.[ Missouri, K & T R Co v. Evans 175 U.S. 723 (1899) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MISSOURI, K & T R CO v. EVANS, 175 U.S. 723 (1899) 175 U.S. 723 MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, Plaintiff in Error,v.
J. M. EVANS.
No. 78.
November 6, 1899 Messrs. James Hagerman and J. M. Bryson for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Rush Taggart and H. Chilton for defendant in error. Dismissed with costs, on the authority of Mason v. United States, 136 U.S. 581, 34 L. Ed. 545, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1062; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179, 36 L. Ed. 933, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39; and Sipperley v. Smith, 155 U.S. 86, 39 L. Ed. 79, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.1 Footnotes Footnote 1 See 29 C. C. A. 523, 86 Fed. Rep. 1.[ Missouri, K & T R Co v. Evans 175 U.S. 723 (1899) ]