CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899)
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899)
174 U.S. 718
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
v.
CAMPBELL.
No. 235.
May 22, 1899
W. F. Evans and M. A. Low, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA.
The facts of this case are substantially the same as in No. 236 ( Railway Co. v. Strum, 19 Sup. Ct. 979), except as to the amount involved, and the court in which the proceedings in attachment were commenced, and the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899)
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
v.
CAMPBELL.
No. 235.
May 22, 1899
W. F. Evans and M. A. Low, for plaintiff in error.
Page 174 U.S. 718, 719
Mr. Justice McKENNA.
The facts of this case are substantially the same as in No. 236 ( Railway Co. v. Strum, 19 Sup. Ct. 979), except as to the amount involved, and the court in which the proceedings in attachment were commenced, and the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
