CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899)174 U.S. 718
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
v.
CAMPBELL.
No. 235.
May 22, 1899
W. F. Evans and M. A. Low, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA.
The facts of this case are substantially the same as in No. 236
( Railway Co. v. Strum, 19 Sup. Ct. 979), except as to the amount
involved, and the court in which the proceedings in attachment were
commenced, and the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for
further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Opinions
v.
CAMPBELL.
No. 235.
May 22, 1899 W. F. Evans and M. A. Low, for plaintiff in error. Page 174 U.S. 718, 719 Mr. Justice McKENNA. The facts of this case are substantially the same as in No. 236 ( Railway Co. v. Strum, 19 Sup. Ct. 979), except as to the amount involved, and the court in which the proceedings in attachment were commenced, and the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, R I & P R CO v. CAMPBELL, 174 U.S. 718 (1899) 174 U.S. 718 CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.v.
CAMPBELL.
No. 235.
May 22, 1899 W. F. Evans and M. A. Low, for plaintiff in error. Page 174 U.S. 718, 719 Mr. Justice McKENNA. The facts of this case are substantially the same as in No. 236 ( Railway Co. v. Strum, 19 Sup. Ct. 979), except as to the amount involved, and the court in which the proceedings in attachment were commenced, and the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Search This Case
