HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899)
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899)
173 U.S. 225
HENRIETTA MIN. & MILL. CO.
v.
HILL.
No. 138.
February 27, 1899
W. H. Barnes and Frank Asbury Johnson, for appellant.
Mr. Justice BROWN.
The facts in this case, so far as they bear upon the question in controversy, are precisely similar to the one just decided (Milling Co. v. Johnson, 19 Sup. Ct. 402), and the judgment of the supreme court of Arizona is therefore affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRIETTA MIN & MILL CO v. HILL, 173 U.S. 225 (1899)
HENRIETTA MIN. & MILL. CO.
v.
HILL.
No. 138.
February 27, 1899
W. H. Barnes and Frank Asbury Johnson, for appellant.
Mr. Justice BROWN.
The facts in this case, so far as they bear upon the question in controversy, are precisely similar to the one just decided (Milling Co. v. Johnson, 19 Sup. Ct. 402), and the judgment of the supreme court of Arizona is therefore affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
