LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

U.S. Supreme Court

LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

167 U.S. 203

LUMBERMAN'S NAT. BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT
v.
HUSTON.

No 203.

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. May 10, 1897

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined

Page 167 U.S. 203, 204

in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.

J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.


U.S. Supreme Court

LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

167 U.S. 203

LUMBERMAN'S NAT. BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT
v.
HUSTON.

No 203.

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. May 10, 1897

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined

Page 167 U.S. 203, 204

in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.

J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.