LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897)167 U.S. 203
LUMBERMAN'S NAT. BANK OF
WILLIAMSPORT
v.
HUSTON.
No 203.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. May 10, 1897
The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined
in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.
J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.
Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.
Opinions
v.
HUSTON. No 203. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. May 10, 1897 The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined Page 167 U.S. 203, 204 in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result. J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error. Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.
U.S. Supreme Court
LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON, 167 U.S. 203 (1897) 167 U.S. 203 LUMBERMAN'S NAT. BANK OF WILLIAMSPORTv.
HUSTON. No 203. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. May 10, 1897 The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined Page 167 U.S. 203, 204 in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result. J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error. Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.
Search This Case
