CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)
166 U.S. 258
CHICAGO. B. & Q. R. CO.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.
March 1, 1897
John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error.
John S. Miller, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of.
For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)
CHICAGO. B. & Q. R. CO.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.
March 1, 1897
John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error.
John S. Miller, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of.
For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.